Write a short note on indirect or representative democracy

Advantages and Disadvantages of Representative Democracy

In the process of doing so, they try to find common ground between different parties in case of a conflict among the people and this leads to unity in society. In recall procedures, interrupting routine patterns of fixed office terms may stress the aspect of citizens reclaiming control of office functions.

Under representative democracy, the elected individuals will be responsible for making policies which will be more stable and consistent and would hence be beneficial to the people. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this.

This is the very basic concept of leadership which unites people with different views in a country. They saw a danger in tyranny of the majority. Slower processes also remove the risk of over-reaction by people.

And they have time to hear a range of viewpoints and carefully consider the consequences of new laws. In addition, pragmatic theories contended that direct democracy could not work under space and time conditions of large modern states.

Libertarian Marxistshowever, fully support direct democracy in the form of the proletarian republic and see majority rule and citizen participation as virtues. Since constitutional law cannot be altered by state legislatures, this direct democracy component gives the people an automatic superiority and sovereignty, over representative government Magelby, They do this by electing their representatives to the government.

This can happen in the form of an assembly democracy or by initiative and referendum with ballot voting, with direct voting on issues instead of for candidates or parties.

As a consequence, society is built up by people, who are free and have the power to defend themselves with weapons. It is argued that in referendums turnout is often lower than in general elections and that referendums lead to a lower turnout in elections also. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referendums.

In such a way, if there is anything that people find unfavorably implemented in the laws they could make their stand with the representation of their knowledgeable and skilled MP.

One promise of direct democracy is that more political participation can be realized. In any case, those organisations with enough money to buy political advertising would have too much power in a direct democracy.

These two structures constitute a situation characterized as one of dual power by David Graeberthough a peculiar one as they are both formed by the same movement. Representative Democracy Yes because Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies outside Switzerlanddirect-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale system alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features.

With this representation the citizens are capable of making their voices heard in the government. Thus, in many countries and theories, these principles have been tied to and absorbed by a narrow notion of representative democracy rather than being used to support a more comprehensive concept of democracy.

There is Parliamentary democracy in India. Suffrage is only given to people who are citizens. In democracy all citizens have equal right to vote. President Theodore Rooseveltin his "Charter of Democracy" speech to the Ohio constitutional convention, stated: Representative democracy is inevitable because participation of all citizens in governmental affairs is not possible today due to large territories, high population and complicated public issues.

Direct democracy

The candidate with the most votes gets elected. Another underlying assumption with direct democracy is how people assume the population of a country will be willing to participate in the voting process on a regular basis at the expense of the their own personal resources.

Referendums of governmental authorities take place when a president, cabinet, or legislature decides, under preregulated conditions or ad hoc, to call a popular vote on a particular issue.

Due to the short lifespan of the Commune, only one citywide election was held and the structures necessary to facilitate future organized elections on large scales was largely nonexistent.

Large communities like cities and countries use this method, but it may not be needed for a small group. Under the status quo, direct democracy is not used often because it is very difficult to ensure a fair vote, in which all the people can express their views on a certain policy, it is much more efficient and convenient to elect representatives and have them express the views of the population as in representative democracy.

Fundamental rights and different freedoms are given to the individuals.

Direct vs. Representative Democracy

Largely inspired by anarchist principles of absence of coercion, horizontality and non-hierarchy, these mechanisms were already developed and used during the alter-globalization movement, and OWS is in this tradition of neo-anarchism.

Direct democracy gives power back to the people. Particularly in times of political crises, direct democracy can provide an important function in offering channels for reactivating popular sovereignty as the fundamental value and force of democracy.

All citizens were allowed in the Assembly. A common term that is used interchangeably with indirect democracy is a representative democracy. Indirect democracy is usually contrasted with direct democracy. In direct democracy, people directly vote on whether a law will be passed.

But in indirect democracy, people only choose the representatives who will then make the law. Representative or indirect democracy can be the best type of government so as to protect human rights and provide people a voice inside the government. In this kind of government, there are different elements that exist within the United States as well as other countries in the world.

Representative or indirect democracy can be the best type of government so as to protect human rights and provide people a voice inside the government. In this kind of government, there are different elements that exist within the United States as well as other countries in the world.

Practically speaking, representative democracy is the only democracy that's around at any state or national level. (State and even national referenda are sometimes used, but only for a very small. Oct 25,  · An indirect democracy, on the other hand, uses a small group of officials to make decisions of importance on behalf of their constituents.

In both cases, the input of the people is the cornerstone of the government, but the government is run in different ways. All adult citizens of a country have the right to vote in a democracy. This vote is extremely important because it determines the kind of government that comes in power.

Name a few countries in the world which have a democratic form of government. The role of the citizens becomes extremely important in .

Write a short note on indirect or representative democracy
Rated 4/5 based on 10 review
Indirect democracy - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia